Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Home About Journal Editorial Board Search Current Issue Ahead of print Back Issues Instructions Subscribe Login  Users: 459 Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 10-13
Hepatitis B core antibody testing in Indian blood donors: A double-edged sword!

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication16-Apr-2012


Background: Until lately, anti-HBc antibodies were considered an effective marker for occult Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and have served their role in improving blood safety. But, with the development of advanced tests for HBV DNA detection, the role of anti-HBc in this regard stands uncertain. Materials and Methods: Anti-HBc and HBsAg ELISA and ID-NAT tests were run in parallel on donor blood samples between April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010 at the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi. A positive ID-NAT was followed by Discriminatory NAT assay. Results: A total of 94 247 samples were tested with a total core positivity rate of 10.22%. We identified nearly 9.17% of donors who were reactive for anti-HBc and negative for HBsAg and HBV DNA. These are the donors who are potentially non-infectious and may be returned to the donor pool. Conclusion: Although anti HBc testing has a definite role in improving blood safety, centers that have incorporated NAT testing may not derive any additional benefit by performing anti-HBc testing, especially in resource-limited countries like ours.

Keywords: Anti-HBc, HBsAg, ID-NAT

How to cite this article:
Makroo R N, Chowdhry M, Bhatia A, Arora B, Rosamma N L. Hepatitis B core antibody testing in Indian blood donors: A double-edged sword!. Asian J Transfus Sci 2012;6:10-3

How to cite this URL:
Makroo R N, Chowdhry M, Bhatia A, Arora B, Rosamma N L. Hepatitis B core antibody testing in Indian blood donors: A double-edged sword!. Asian J Transfus Sci [serial online] 2012 [cited 2023 Mar 31];6:10-3. Available from:

   Introduction Top

Presently, screening for HBsAg is the only mandatory screening test for the detection of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in blood banks in India as per the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the amendments thereof. Screening of blood for the detection of HBsAg, however, does not rule out the risk of transmission of hepatitis B totally, because during the serological response of the host to infection, there is a phase during which the HBsAg cannot be detected in the blood, although hepatitis B infection is present. This phase is called as the "core window period." During this "window period," detection of the antibody to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) serves as a useful serological marker for hepatitis B infection. [1] Evaluating the usefulness of anti-HBc screening is critical, particularly for India and other countries that have intermediate and high hepatitis B endemicity. [2] Anti-HBc was initially introduced in blood banking as a surrogate marker for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to a certain extent for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as well. It was also found to be an excellent indicator of occult HBV infection during the "core window" period. Blood units collected from individuals chronically infected with HBV in whom HBsAg is not detectable and from donors with acute hepatitis B who are in the window period following disappearance of HBsAg and prior to the appearance of anti-HBs can effectively be removed from the inventory. It was for these reasons that a few blood banks in India as well incorporated anti-HBc testing in their donor screening protocols. [3] However, with the introduction and institution of more advanced techniques for Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) like TMA (Transcription Mediated Amplification) or PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction), those are able to amplify and detect the HBV DNA; the role of anti-HBc antibody in donor screening is being questioned by users across the globe. In addition, testing for anti-HBc results in attrition of large number of donors, causing shrinkage of the effective donor pool.

The present study was undertaken in the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi from April 2006 till December 2010. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of anti-HBc as routine donor screening tool in a blood bank already equipped with NAT in a resource-limited country which falls in the intermediate zone for Hepatitis B endemicity.

   Materials and Methods Top

This study was conducted in the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi from April 1, 2006 till December 31, 2010. All donors coming to the Department of Transfusion Medicine and fulfilling the general criteria for blood donation as per the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the amendments thereof, during the study period, were included in the study. Donors who did not fulfill these criteria were deferred from donating blood and hence excluded from the study. Donors with medical history of symptoms suggestive of Acquired Immuno Deficiency syndrome, history of jaundice or blood transfusion in last one year, and history of close contact with a patient suffering from hepatitis in the last 6 months were also deferred from donating blood at our center. The detailed history and clinical examination was carried out for all the donors by qualified staff trained to screen donors for blood donation. Consent for blood donation and infectious maker testing was obtained at the time of donor selection. Samples for infectious marker testing were collected at the time of blood donation from the diversion pouch of the primary bag. A 3- to 4-ml sample in a plain vacutainer was collected for ELISA testing. Another 6-ml sample was collected in K2 EDTA vacutainer for NAT. The samples were run in parallel by ELISA for the detection of HBsAg and anti-HBc and Individual Donor NAT (ID-NAT). Third-generation ELISA kits (Monolisa TM HBsAg ULTRA, BIO-RAD and Monolisa TM Anti-HBc PLUS, BIO-RAD) using fully automated EVOLIS walk away system (BIO-RAD) were used for detecting HBsAg and anti-HBc, respectively. All samples testing positive by ELISA for HBsAg and/or anti-HBc were repeat tested in duplicate using the same ELISA kits. ID-NAT was performed using PROCLEIX® ULTRIO® Assay (Gen-Probe Inc.) using a semi-automated platform "eSAS." All samples testing positive by ID-NAT (initial reactive) were repeat tested to rule out false positivity or contamination. All repeat-reactive samples by ID-NAT were then subjected to discriminatory NAT testing (dNAT) using Procleix discriminatory assay to differentiate between HBV, HIV, and HCV nucleic acids.

Only those samples which were repeat reactive for ELISA or reactive by dNAT using Procleix discriminatory assay ID-NAT were considered as positive/reactive.

   Results Top

A total of 94 247 samples collected at the time of donation were tested between April 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010. The total core positivity rate (IgG+IgM) observed at our center was 10.22% (9 638/94 247), while 1.2% (1 134/94 247) of donors were positive for HBsAg. The results are given in [Table 1].
Table 1: HBsAg and Anti HBc ELISA results

Click here to view

Of the 8 660 donors reactive by anti-HBc ELISA but negative for HBsAg, only 0.15% (13/8 660) showed the presence of HBV DNA by discriminatory assay, while the remaining 99.85% (8 647/8 660) were HBV DNA negative. These constitute 9.17% (8 647/94 247) of the total donor population.

The cohort of donors testing positive for anti-HBc in the absence of HBsAg and HBV DNA was primarily constituted of male donors (98.39%; 8 508/8 647), with 1.61% (139/8 647) being females. All the donors were between 18 and 60 years of age, with the majority, 40.67% (3 517/8 647), in the 18 to 30 years age group. The second largest category (34.10%, 2 945/8 647) was of donors between 31 and 40 years of age. Nearly 17.76% (1 536/8 647) of donors were between 41 to 50 years of age, the remainder, 7.47% (649/8647) being above 50 years of age.

   Discussion Top

With the incidence of HBsAg in India being fairly high, there is a definite risk of inadvertently transfusing HBV-infected blood. [1],[4] Despite testing for HBsAg, post Transfusion HBV infection continues to occur due to the fact that many a times, HBsAg is circulating at very low and undetectable level for screening assays. [5] Therefore, it is strongly felt that a marker must be utilized for screening of blood in the Indian population to detect the presence of hepatitis B during the window period. [1],[4] It was Mosley et al. who suggested that anti-HBc screening of blood donations might prevent HBV transmission from HBsAg-negative blood donors. [6] Although these sensitive serological tests have shortened the pre-seroconversion window period, they still are not able to identify a number of newly infected donors. [7] This residual risk due to donations of blood during the window period has been circumvented by using NAT assays which has considerably shortened the window period. [8],[9],[10],[11] The window period for HBV infection by ID-NAT is estimated to be 24.6 days as compared with 38.3 days by serological tests (Ag-Ab combo assays). [12]

Testing for anti-HBc still remains an unresolved issue across the globe. It is felt that a large fraction of "anti-HBc-alone" patients can be assumed to have an unresolved chronic infection with low-grade, possibly intermittent virus production. Such individuals may have detectable serum HBV DNA and are potentially infectious. [13] In our study, 10.22% (9 638/94 247) were positive for anti-HBc, of which, 9.19% (8 660/94 247) of donors were positive for anti-HBc and negative for HBsAg. Varied prevalence of core positivity has been reported by Indian studies. Dhawan et al., [14] from Chandigarh reported a core positive rate of 8.4%, whereas a high positivity rate of 18.3% was observed by Bhattacharya et al. [15] from West Bengal. In a study by Col Kumar et al., [1] incidence of anti-HBc total in blood donor population was pegged at 15.9% and it was 11.6% in our previous study [16] at New Delhi. Another study from New Delhi by Chaudhuri et al. [17] revealed the prevalence of anti-HBc to be 10.82%. These observations are comparable with our data.

Amini et al., [18] in a study done on 4 930 healthy blood donors, found that 5.1% were positive for anti-HBc without having any detectable HBsAg; however, they did not determine the presence of HBV-DNA. Behzad-Behbahani et al., [5] in a study conducted on 2 000 healthy blood donors in Iran, found 6.55% HBsAg-negative blood samples to be positive for anti-HBc antibody. Our results, to a large extent, were in agreement to these studies.

In our study, only 0.15% of anti-HBc-positive and HBsAg-negative donors showed the presence of HBV DNA in their sera. Majority, i.e., 99.85% of these donors were anti-HBc positive and negative for HBsAg and HBV DNA. These constitute 9.17% of the total donor population. Such units may be considered non-infectious and returned to the donor pool. This is supported by the evidence from Poland, where the HBV infection was not transmitted by transfusion of red blood cell and platelet concentrate from donor with ~200 IU HBV DNA/ml and from HBV DNA-negative/anti-HBc-positive donors in which the HBV DNA was detected in the next donation. [19] Though a number of other studies report cases of HBV transmission after the transfusion of anti-HBc-positive blood, [20] the most recent of these studies dates back to late nineties.

In countries where HBV infection is endemic, anti-HBc donor screening would result in high discard rate of collected blood, [21],[22] HBV-DNA screening of blood donors is presumed to be necessary and very beneficial. [22]

Usefulness of NAT in detecting early Window Period donations has been accepted by many authors. [23] NAT is considered most beneficial in developing countries where the estimated disease burden is high. However, its introduction for routine screening of donated blood has suffered a setback due to high costs, which makes it unaffordable for many centers.

Sawke and Sawke [24] feel that as India has high prevalence of anti-HBc, screening of donor blood for total anti-HBc is not practical and should not be used as a criterion to discard blood. Screening for IgM- anti- HBc of blood units negative for HBsAg, on the other hand, could identify potentially infectious units. El-Sherif et al. [25] have proposed a policy of testing blood donors for anti-HBc in addition to HBsAg and those found positive for anti-HBc to be submitted to HBV DNA testing. This approach would be less expensive, would reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection, and decrease the rejection rate of the precious units of collected blood positive for anti-HBc only. Though this approach would return 9.17% of our donors to the donor pool, it would still fail to identify window period donations.

Allain [26] has recommended that the use of anti-HBc screening of blood donors be restricted to areas where HBV seroprevalence is relatively low (<2% anti-HBc reactivity), otherwise, the impact on donor deferral would be unsustainable. Another factor that limits the efficacy of this test is its notorious lack of specificity. According to Laperche, [10] HBV DNA screening would be more effective in countries with high or medium endemicity, and where anti-HBc testing is not routinely done.

However, considering the resource limitations in many areas in our country, it may not be possible or practical to provide facilities for advanced tests like NAT. The importance of core antibody testing in such areas cannot be under emphasized.

   Conclusion Top

Addition of anti-HBc to blood donor screening along with HBsAg improves blood safety, but leads to attrition of donors, especially in India which lies in the intermediate zone of hepatitis B endemicity. The best alternative for improving blood safety in our country is to add NAT testing to donated blood. It will identify most potentially infectious units of blood including window period donations and seronegative infections. Therefore, the applicability of anti-HBc testing in routine screening of donated blood is doubtful.

   References Top

1.Kumar H, Gupta PK, Jaiprakash M. The role of anti-HBc IgM in screening of blood donors. MJAFI 2007;63:350-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Makroo RN, Raina V, Chowdhry M, Pathuppalli M. Hepatitis B Virus Infection among blood donors of North India. Apollo Med 2007;4:339-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Makroo RN, Raina V, Goyal N, Kaushik V. Effectiveness of screening blood for anti-HBc and anti-HCV on post transfusion hepatitis on multiply transfused patients. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2001;19:49-50.   Back to cited text no. 3
4.Hoofnagle JH, Seefe LB, Bales ZB, Zimmerman HJ. Type B hepatitis after transfusion with blood containing antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. N Engl J Med 1978;298:1379-83.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Behzad-Behbahani A, Mafi-Nejad A, Tabei SZ, Lankarani KB, Rashidi M, Rasouli M, et al. Indication of anti-HBc antibody screening and HBV- DNA detection in diagnosing latent hepatitis B virus infection. Iran J Med Sci 2005;30:28-33.  Back to cited text no. 5
6.Mosley JW, Stevens CE, Aach RD, Hollinger FB, Mimms LT, Solomon LR, Barbosa LH, Nemo GJ. Donor screening for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and hepatitis B virus infection in transfusion recipients. Transfusion. 1995 Jan; 35(1):5-12.  Back to cited text no. 6
7.Makroo RN, Choudhury N, Jagannathan L, Malhotra MP, Raina V, Chaudhary RK, et al. Multicenter evaluation of individual donor nucleic acid testing (NAT) for simultaneous detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus -1 and Hepatitis B and C viruses in Indian blood donors. Indian J Med Res 2008;127:140-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
8.Romano L, Velati C, Baruffi L, Fomiatti L, Colucci G, Zanetti AR, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a semiautomated, standardized assay for detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in blood donations. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:2991-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
9.Dodd RY, Notari EP 4th, Stramer SL. Current prevalence and incidence of infectious disease markers and estimated window period risk in the American Red Cross blood donor population. Transfusion 2002;42:975-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
10.Laperche S. Blood safety and nucleic acid testing in Europe [editorial]. Euro Surveill 2005;10:516.  Back to cited text no. 10
11.Lelie N, Heaton A. Hepatitis B: A review of the role of NAT in enhancing blood safety. J Clin Virol 2006;36 Suppl 1:S1-2.  Back to cited text no. 11
12.Makroo RN. Practice of safe blood transfusion: Compendium of Transfusion Medicine. 2 nd ed. New Delhi, India: KongPosh Publications Pvt. Ltd.; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 12
13.Li A, Yuan Q, Huang Z, Fan J, Guo R, Lou B, et al. Novel double-antigen sandwich immunoassay for human hepatitis B core antibody. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010;17:464-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
14.Dhawan HK, Marwaha N, Sharma RR, Chawla Y, Thakral B, Saluja K, et al. Anti-HBc screening in Indian blood donors: Still an unresolved issue. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:5327-30.  Back to cited text no. 14
15.Bhattacharya P, Chandra PK, Datta S, Banerjee A, Chakraborty S, Rajendran K, et al. Significant increase in HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis infections among blood donors in West Bengal, Eastern India 2004-2005: Exploratory screening reveals high frequency of occult HBV infection. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:3730-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
16.Makroo RN, Raina V, Kaushik V. Prevalence of hepatitis markers (HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti HCV) in Indian blood donors. Vox Sang 1998;74:1142.  Back to cited text no. 16
17.Chaudhuri V, Nanu A, Panda SK, Chand P. Evaluation of serologic screening of blood donors in India reveals a lack of correlation between anti-HBc titer and PCR-amplified HBV DNA. Transfusion 2003;43:1442-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
18.Amini S, Mahmoodi MF, Andalibi S, Solati AA. Seroepidemiology of hepatitis B, delta and human immunodeficiency virus infections in Hamadan province, Iran: A population based study. J Trop Med Hyg 1993;96:277-87.  Back to cited text no. 18
19.Reesink HW, Engelfriet CP, Henn G, Mayr WR, Delage G, Bernier F, et al. Occult hepatitis B infection in blood donors. Vox Sang 2008;94:153-66.  Back to cited text no. 19
20.Manzini P, Girotto M, Borsotti R, Giachino O, Guaschino R, Lanteri M, et al. Italian blood donors with anti-HBc and occult hepatitis B virus infection. Haematologica 2007;92:1664-70.  Back to cited text no. 20
21.Alexander J, Kowdley V. Epidemiology of hepatitis B-clinical implications. Med Gen Med 2006;8:13-23.  Back to cited text no. 21
22.Hollinger FB, Sood G. Occult hepatitis B virus infection: A covert operation. J Viral Hepat 2010;17:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 22
23.Hennig H, Puchta I, Luhm J, Schlenke P, Georg S, Kirchner H. Frequency and load of hepatitis B virus DNA in first-time blood donors with antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen. Blood 2002;100:2637-41.  Back to cited text no. 23
24.Sawke NG, Sawke GK. Preventing post transfusion hepatitis by screening blood donors for IgM antibody to Hepatitis B core antigen. J Glob Infect Dis 2010;2:246-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
25.El-Sherif AM, Abou-Shady MA, Al-Hiatmy MA, Al-Bahrawy AM, Motawea EA. Screening for hepatitis B virus infection in Egyptian blood donors negative for hepatitis B surface antigen. Hepatol Int 2007;1:469-70.  Back to cited text no. 25
26.Allain JP, on behalf of the ISBT TTI working party "HBV safety" study-group. Characterization of "occult" HBV yield cases identified by NAT (ID or small pool) or anti-HBc screening. Available from: . [Last accessed on 2011 May 3].  Back to cited text no. 26

Correspondence Address:
R N Makroo
Department of Transfusion Medicine, Molecular Biology and Transplant Immunology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi - 110 076
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.95043

Rights and Permissions


  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Economic Evaluation of Nucleic Acid Testing for Screening of Blood Donations for Thalassemia Patients (ECONAT) in Western India
Puneeth Babu Anne, Anubhav Gupta, Sanjeev Misra, Suresh Kumar Sharma, Mahendra Kumar Garg, Archana Bajpayee, Sunita Bundas, Manju Bohra, Vasanth Asirvatham
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Prevalence of transfusion transmissible infections and associated factors among healthy blood donors in North Indian population 4-year experience of licensed blood bank at tertiary care hospital
Sandeep Cheema, Vandana Rana, Kanchan Kulhari, Arvind Yadav, Amit Sachdeva
Journal of Marine Medical Society. 2022; 0(0): 0
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Frequency of hepatitis B virus-DNA among hepatitis B surface-Ag negative, anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive blood donors in Yazd, Iran
Mahtab Vaziri, HayedehJavadzadeh Shahshahani
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science. 2021; 15(2): 179
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Prevalence of Anti-HBc Antibodies among HBsAg Negative Individuals and Its Association with Occult Hepatitis B
Anitha Madhavan, Arun Sachu, Anu Kumar Balakrishnan, Sobha Balakrishnan, Jayalakshmi Vasudevapanicker
Journal of Laboratory Physicians. 2021; 13(01): 001
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Current situation of viral hepatitis in Egypt
Ashraf Elbahrawy, Marwa K. Ibrahim, Ahmed Eliwa, Mohamed Alboraie, Ali Madian, Hussein Hassan Aly
Microbiology and Immunology. 2021; 65(9): 352
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Hepatitis B vaccination at birth: reduces perinatal transmission successfully
Salahuddin Mahmud, Syed Shafi Ahmed
International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination. 2020; 6(1): 4
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 The Prevalence of Occult Hepatitis B Infection among the Blood Donors in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Puducherry
K.P. Athira, K. Vanathy, Rajendra Kulkarni, Rahul Dhodapkar
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2018; 36(3): 426
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Comparison of Procleix Ultrio Elite and Procleix Ultrio NAT Assays for Screening of Transfusion Transmitted Infections among Blood Donors in India
Rahul Chaurasia,Diptiranjan Rout,Shamsuz Zaman,Kabita Chatterjee,Hem Chandra Pandey,Abhishek Kumar Maurya
International Journal of Microbiology. 2016; 2016: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Factors in enhancing blood safety by nucleic acid technology testing for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus
Venkatakrishna Shyamala
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science. 2014; 8(1): 13
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Transfusion transmitted infections in thalassaemics: need for reappraisal of blood screening strategy in India
V. Shyamala
Transfusion Medicine. 2014; 24(2): 79
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Nucleic Acid Technology (NAT) testing for blood screening: impact of individual donation and Mini Pool - NAT testing on analytical sensitivity, screening sensitivity and clinical sensitivity
V. Shyamala
ISBT Science Series. 2014; 9(2): 315
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Provision of ideal transfusion support The essence of thalassemia care
R.N. Makroo,Aakanksha Bhatia
Apollo Medicine. 2014; 11(3): 184
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Risk of hepatitis B infection in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a tertiary care center from South India
B. Guruprasad,S. Kavitha,B.S. Aruna Kumari,B.R. Vijaykumar,B.G. Sumati,Sinha Mahua,L. Appaji,R.S. Jayshree
Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2014; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Hepatitis B Viral DNA Among HBs Antigen Negative Healthy Blood Donors
Maryam Vaezjalali,Shabnam Rashidpour,Hanieh Rezaee,Bashir Hajibeigi,Majid Zeidi,Latif Gachkar,Shadi Aghamohamad,Ronak Najafi,Hossein Goudarzi
Hepatitis Monthly. 2013; 13(3)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 The prevalence of the Hepatitis B core antibody and the occult Hepatitis B infection among voluntary blood donors in Chennai, India
Maheswari, K.S. and Arun, R. and Arumugam, P.
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012; 6(10): 1710-1712



    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Materials and Me...
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded110    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 15    

Recommend this journal

Association Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice

2006 - Asian Journal of Transfusion Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 10th November, 2006