Asian Journal of Transfusion Science
Home About Journal Editorial Board Search Current Issue Ahead of print Back Issues Instructions Subscribe Login  Users: 463 Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 

REVIEW ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2023  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 108-116
New horizons for reduction of blood use: Patient blood management

1 Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Immunology, Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Blood Transfusion Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission31-Jan-2021
Date of Decision11-Jul-2022
Date of Acceptance07-Aug-2022
Date of Web Publication12-Dec-2022


A countrywide study over the eras indicates overuse of blood transfusion can have considerable risks to patients accompanied by significant costs of blood transfusion for patients, hospitals, and health-care systems. Besides, more than 30% of the world's population is anemic. Typically, blood transfusion helps continue suitable oxygen transfer in anemia, i.e., more and more documented as a threatening factor with several adverse outcomes including long hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. Transplantation of allogeneic blood is thus like a two-edged sword. There is no doubt that the blood transfusion is a life-saving treatment, but it should be underpinned by much of up-to-date health-care services. The new theory considered for patient blood management (PBM) also discusses the timely application of evidence-based surgical and clinical theories and focuses on patient outcomes. Furthermore, PBM involves a multidisciplinary methodology to reduce unnecessary transfusions, minimize costs, and cut risks.

Keywords: Blood transfusion, maximum surgical blood ordering schedule, patient blood management

How to cite this article:
Shamsasenjan K, Gharehdaghi S, Khalaf-Adeli E, Pourfathollah AA. New horizons for reduction of blood use: Patient blood management. Asian J Transfus Sci 2023;17:108-16

How to cite this URL:
Shamsasenjan K, Gharehdaghi S, Khalaf-Adeli E, Pourfathollah AA. New horizons for reduction of blood use: Patient blood management. Asian J Transfus Sci [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 21];17:108-16. Available from:

   Introduction Top

The first case of a successful human-to-human blood transfusion was performed by James Blundell in 1818. During the 20th century, blood use was escalated to save patients' lives across the world.[1] However, a fundamental question remained unanswered, that is to say; Is Blood transfusion considered to be safe or not?[2]

It should be noted that misdistribution of oxygen in a tissue can result in oxygen deficiency, ischemia, and expiry. Therefore, allogenic blood transfusion (ABT) may be requested to eliminate critical severe anemia and restore oxygenation and protect patients against bleeding in clinical settings. Evidence has also demonstrated an association between ABT and unsatisfactory clinical outcomes.[3],[4],[5] Accordingly, ABT is correlated with transfusion reactions both infective, for example, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or acquired human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)[6] and noninfective, for example, transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) and, Transfusion-Associated Graft Versus Host Disease (TA-GVHD) and transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM).[7] In this regard, a study established that the length of stays in hospitals and intensive care units (ICUs) as well as mortality rates, were reported to be higher in blood recipients.[8],[9]

In addition, ABT is deemed as one of the costly supportive cures imposing significant economic burdens on health-care systems.[10] Shander et al. demonstrated that the total cost of red blood cell (RBC) unit transfusion in administration processes was $761 USD in surgical situations at four hospitals. In this study, some costs such as long-term adverse effects of treatment and hospitalization charges were neglected.[11]

Besides, Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) were well-known for their rejection of allogenic blood components based on their beliefs. Great experience has been thus gained from JW patients who have been severely anemic or even bleeding patients that described bloodless medical and surgical management. These approaches, known as patient blood management (PBM),[12] have been effectively exploited to reduce ABT use in health-care services for other patients. Accordingly, PBM is an approach to minimize patients' need to ABT. The given approach sets a patient on the axis of choices for the best treatment and ensures their safety. Correct implementation of PBM can also lead to the moderation of inappropriate use of blood components, their adverse effects, as well as their associated costs.[12]

   Blood Transfusion Epidemiology Top

So far, few studies have been published on the epidemiology of blood use, but this limited literature shows bear significant variations (0%–100%) associated with the consumption of blood products in different hospitals and countries due to differences in transfusion practices in health-care centers[13],[14] regarding diagnosis, type of surgery, surgeon's skills, use of advanced surgical and anesthesia techniques, geographical site and hospital ranking.[15]

In a recent observational cohort study of 102470 cases experiencing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in 798 geographical regions in the United States; rates of RBC, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelet (PLT) blood count transfusion varied from 0% to 97.5% between 2008 and 2010.[14] Cobain et al. also performed a retrospective study in the United States, England, Australia, and Denmark and reported that most RBC and plasma transfusion rates had been included in 24% and 34% of cardiovascular surgeries in the United States, respectively. Moreover, RBC and plasma transfusion rates were assessed in 39.7% and 62.7% of surgical treatments in England, respectively. In the other two countries, RBC transfusion rates were, respectively, reported to be 20.7% and 25.7% for malignant diseases; and plasma transfusion rates were 26% and 39.2% for trauma and circulatory diseases, respectively. Furthermore, neoplasms and hematologic diseases had the most usage of PLT in the United States, Australia, and Denmark.[13] In three hospitals in the city of Yazd; Javadzadeh et al. reported that the epidemiology of PLT and RBC use in Iranian patients with malignancy was 82% and 42%, respectively.[16] The use of RBC in surgical settings especially in cardiovascular surgeries and neoplasms was correspondingly significant. In all countries, PLT was mainly used for hematologic diseases and neoplasms, and plasma was almost used in cardiovascular surgeries.

   Blood Transfusion and Medical Treatment Top

Some patients, such as those with major thalassemia and hemophilia, cases on chemotherapy, and patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have a long-lasting dependence on blood components.[17],[18],[19] Early hemophilic treatment was associated with the use of FFP; later, cryoprecipitate and plasma-derived concentrates of clotting factors also became common.[20] The introduction of recombinant activated factor VII and Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate significantly enhanced hemorrhage control in patients developing inhibitors and thus reducing the need for transfusion therapy in these patients.[21]

A study indicated that the average transfusion in leukemic cases was 1.6 PLT concentrates and 2.5 RBC units per week. Both high doses of PLT and packed RBC transfusion were linked to less clinical responses and an increase in quick death after the induction phase in chemotherapy.[22] It must be noted that, following high-dosage chemotherapy in leukemia, bone marrow is suppressed and leads to the increased rates of RBC and PLT transfusion. Seeking chemotherapy for solid tumors may also need a blood transfusion, but less than leukemia.[23]

Gene therapy mainly corrects malfunctioning genes accounting for genetic syndrome through several approaches.[24] According to the studies, gene therapy can discount blood transfusion or minimize it in hemoglobinopathic, hemophilic, and, thalassemic patients who are frequently need RBC transfusion.[25],[26],[27],[28]

   Blood Transfusion and Surgery Top

Preoperative anemia is considered a risk factor for infection, and acute kidney injury. It makes the need for RBC transfusion and causes prolonged stay in healthcare centers. Moreover, management of acute symptomatic anemia is particularly challenging when the administration of blood transfusions fails.[29] Excessive hemorrhage can be also attributed to other causes of trauma which contributes in almost 30% of death cases.[30] Gupta et al. reported that blood loss rates >250 ml in patients experiencing laparoscopic liver incision resulted in clinical status failure.[31] Rankin et al. also demonstrated that massive transfusion was a major need in elective surgery, for example, orthopedic and central nervous system surgeries. Accordingly, surgery candidates had lost about 11 L of blood intraoperatively whose average of administrated units was 24.5 units of RBC and plasma products as well as 4.5 units of PLT orders.[32] Another investigation indicated that blood transfusion is a significant predictor of increased morbidity and mortality rates in patients with liver cancers and surgery candidates.[33] According to another investigation, the adverse effects associated with transfusion after hepatectomy-associated colorectal metastases were dose-dependent. The researchers found that single-dose or no-unit recipients had shown better outcomes when compared to two-unit recipients. Mortality in the former group was 2.5% and 1.2%, and it was 11.1% in the latter. Moreover, they found that the transfusion of more units cause longer hospitalization however it should be considered that it may be confounding factors in which patient requiring more blood may already be compromised.[34]

According to a number of studies, the need for blood transfusion was higher in on-pump CABG and combined CABG and valve surgery, since more extensive tissue injury might result in a greater amount of clotting factor and PLT consumption whose effect on bleeding risk higher.[35],[36] It should be noted that great blood loss is common during orthopedic surgery such as neuromuscular scoliosis cases due to the reduction of clotting factor levels and increased risk of bleeding in underlying neuromuscular diseases.[37] Another study had correspondingly found a relationship between the need for blood transfusion and the prescription of serotonergic antidepressants among patients with orthopedic surgical experiences. These drugs could inhibit serotonin-mediated PLT activation and increase more blood loss.[38] In surgical settings, multiple factors including pre- and post-operative anemia incidence, intraoperative blood loss, underlying diseases, patients coagulation statue, the type of surgery, site of surgery, redo or combining of surgery, as well as some surgical techniques increase the need for transfusion.[35],[36],[37]

   Risks of Transfusion Top

ABT may be assumed very safe, but this is not always entirely true. It can lead to significant adverse effects and needs cautious attention. ABT is related to transfusion events with both infective and noninfective difficulties. The infectious complications are caused by bloodborne pathogens which include viral infections, for example, cytomegalovirus, human T-cell lymphotropic virus 1, 2, HIV (1, 2), hepatitis virus including B,[39] C, and E types, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, and more novel Ebola and Zika viruses along with emerging infectious diseases.[40] A study reported that the risk of bacterial infections and short-term mortality in perioperative transfusion recipients was more than nonrecipient patients after surgery.[41] However, some studies did not demonstrate a constant relationship between postoperative infection and blood transfusion therapy.[41],[42] Scientific advances in this field have severely reduced the likelihood of microbial bloodborne disease but some of the risks have remained the same containing TRALI, TRIM, TA-GVHD, and TACO and other serious complications.[43] However, these problems can be partly diminished using the prescription of leukodepletion transfusion, irradiation, and cautious donor/recipient selection.[7] Evidence even showed that hemorrhage and transfusion may increase the risks of relapse after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.[44] As suggested by Schwann et al., the use of transfusion in CABG surgery could augment mortality risk.[45] A number of studies had further confirmed that the use of blood transfusion in orthopedic surgeries make delays in wound healing[46],[47] and consequently increases hospitalization up to 1.5 times.[46] It should be noted that transfusion can modify host immunity which makes morbidity or mortality possible. Recurrent tumors, secondary infections, and metastases are examples of immunosuppressive effects. The logic is that ABT can result in intensifying metastasis possibility and cancer development by down-regulating the immune system in patients.[48]

   Costs of Transfusion Top

ABT accounts for up to 5% of the whole health-care charges in advanced countries.[10] Costs associated with blood transfusion can thus significantly increase the burden of health-care system costs, for example, increasing ICU residency and hospitalization days, postoperative use of blood components, adverse effects of ABT treatment, frequency of laboratory tests, and overall blood production up to administration costs. Therefore, unnecessary blood product transfusion needs to be reduced to mitigate health-care costs.[49] Forbes et al. found that the patient's average charges and hospital's average costs per unit transfused were $219 and $155, respectively. In this study, most costs were associated with the laboratory tests.[50] The related literature had also calculated the total cost of RBC transfusion in outpatients with solid tumors and leukemia. In solid tumors, less cost by $474 per BRC unit had been spent when compared to $512 per RBC transfusion in patients with leukemia. Thus, the type of cancer, patient's age, and environmental differences might have increased transfusion-associated costs.[51] It should be noted that costs associated with transfusion practices annually rise along with scientific advances, for example, nucleic acid amplification test routinization.[52] Since ABT-associated costs are annually increasing, cost-effective approaches should be used as alternatives for blood transfusion considering price adjustment.

   What is Patient Blood Management? Top

Some reasons about why PBM exists including an increasing gap between supply and order of blood components, lack of safety, and adverse effects of blood products as well as increasing costs of transfusion.[53] PBM can thus, reduce inappropriate transfusion. It is also known as an evidence-based and a patient-centered multidisciplinary program that concurrently helps ensuring patient safety and blood use reduction. As well, PBM focuses on three pillars: improving hematopoiesis, minimizing blood loss, optimizing coagulation and increasing biological tolerance of anemia in patients. PBM approaches in surgery can be divided into three stages; pre-, peri-, and post-operative procedures.[54]

PBM means beyond the conception of proper use of blood components because it significantly decreases frequent transfusions by reducing possible risk factors that may result in repeated transfusion.[53] Hence, PBM is a universally recognized concept validated by the World Health Organization (WHO) and aimed to manage transfusion practices, decrease charges, and improve hospitalization days. It is also applicable in surgical and clinical settings to provide access to blood and blood components for patients who actually need a transfusion.[55] Gallagher et al. implemented a PBM program in hospitals and investigated effects of PBM strategies in Western Australia from 2008 to 2015. The given project began with team training for physicians and nurses, revising patients' clinical information, and improving clinical care such as preoperative anemia improvement. This intervention led to a significant reduction in blood transfusion incidence and demonstrated that staff training played a key role in the efficiency of PBM program.[56]

   Anemia Correction Top

The definition of anemia provided by WHO is a hemoglobin (Hb) threshold of 12 g/dl in females and 13 g/dl in males.[57] The first step in PBM is the identification of patients who are at higher risk of developing anemia and bleeding disorders in clinical examinations and taking a history. Subsequently, proper decisions need to be made and proper measures should be made based on patients' clinical conditions.[58] Anemia is also a common complication in patients undergoing surgery, acute hemorrhage cases, old individuals, as well as cardiac patients. Thus, low Hb is considered an important and independent factor in predicting needs for ABT as well as increasing rates of mortality and morbidity during surgeries.[59] In 2015, Lasocki et al. observed that most of the patients experiencing selective orthopedic operation had standard Hb thresholds but they had become anemic after surgery. They found that the presence of anemia before surgery might result in the worsening of diseases and complications associated with blood transfusion. The prevalence of its adverse effects in anemic patients was 36.9% and in nonanemic cases was also reported by 22.2%. In addition, patients with anemia before surgery had experienced longer hospital stay.[60] Hence, it is important to correct anemia to acceptable iron stores, through preoperative administration of adequate Vitamin B12, folic acid, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA).[4] Cuenca et al. reported that the need for ABT after the operation had been minimized once patients underwent total knee replacement treated with folate (5 mg/day), ferrous sulfate (256 mg/day), and ascorbic acid (1000 mg/day) at least 4 weeks before the surgery.[61] Lidder et al. conducted a clinical trial examining ferrous sulfate (200 mg) oral treatment for 14 days before colorectal surgery and found it to be an easy and low-cost care instead of ABT reduction.[62] Hence, if patients have oral iron absorption deficiency, iron intolerance, or because of a small opportunity for surgery need faster treatments, iron injection must be used to increase its stores. Today, there are several types of intravenous iron formulations. Counter-indication of iron treatment can be mentioned as iron sensitivity, iron overload, and anemia disassociated with iron.[63] Adkinson et al. conducted a pilot study comparing the efficacy of ferric carboxymaltose with intravenous ferumoxytol in patients with iron deficiency anemia as nonresponsive individuals to oral iron. The patients treated with ferric carboxymaltose or ferumoxytol intravenously over 15 min on days 1 and 8 or 9 for full respective dosages of 1.02 g and 1.50 g. Ferric carboxymaltose had more allergic responses than ferumoxytol.[64]

Erythropoiesis-stimulated agents (ESAs) such as erythropoietin derivatives (α-epoetin and α-darbepoetin) can also increase RBC mass in an anemic patient to reduce the risk of the need for transfusion during surgery. However, investigations have raised worries about the use of ESAs to be added to Hb concentrations in patients undergoing hemodialysis above a level intended solely to prevent them from inappropriate RBC transfusions.[65] Anti-erythropoietin (anti-EPO) immunoglobulin associated with pure RBC aplasia is also a severe adverse effect that can happen in the treatments by ESAs.[66] RBC aplasia mediated by anti-EPO can mainly occur in cases undergoing treatment by epoetin alfa. The incidence percentage of aplasia was also reported in a study in which aplasia related to EPO administration was a rare episode that had happened among some patients with kidney failure.[67] Similarly, in a meta-analysis, it was observed that ESAs in cancer patients might augment mortality and degrade survival rates. The mortality associated with treatment by ESAs needed to be stabilized versus their profits.[68] Evidence also revealed that EPO therapy could be cost-effective, with or without autologous blood obtained in perioperative settings.[69]

It should be noted that packed cell (PC) transfusion and anemia are correlated with illness worsening and death likelihood. Anemia correction in patients may also progress operation safety and outcomes in patients more than PC transfusion.[4]

   Point-of-Care Testing Top

Intraoperative homeostatic regulation is essential as it can prevent probable problems associated with transfusion and surgery in anemic patients.[70] Hence, Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) has numerous benefits when compared to usual laboratory tests for quicker turn-around times as well as well-timed choices on coagulation interference. The most common POCT is the activated clotting time, used to monitor heparin therapy during cardiopulmonary bypass. Viscoelastic coagulation assessments including thromboelastography and Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) have been also suggested for the treatment of postoperative bleeding. ROTEM is a POCT device that can be used to calculate viscoelastic properties on various features of blood coagulation in traumas and surgeries.[71] Khalaf Adeli et al. conducted an investigation on changes in POC tests in elective valve coronary cardiac operation. They revealed that PLT count and PLT aggregation were reduced during surgery, leading to augmented bleeding and transfusion rate, postoperatively.[72] A cohort study conducted by Smith et al. correspondingly revealed that POCT had statistically and significantly diminished blood components received during lung-transplantation surgeries.[73] In a systematic review and meta-analysis, it was further validated that the routine use of POCT reduced PLT and RBC transfusion, death rates, hospitalization days, duration of ICU stays, reoperation for blood loss, and critical kidney damage in cardiac operations. The Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation™ as a diagnostic reading test valuation demonstrated that the value of the evidence was “low” or “very low” for all results.[74] Furthermore, Forestier et al. recommended that POCT needed to be routinized for cardiac operations without any excessive bleeding.[75]

   Antifibrinolytics Top

To reduce blood transfusion, blood loss should be reduced by administering pharmacological drugs including antifibrinolytic factors, tranexamic acid (TXA), epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), protease inhibitor, for example, aprotinin and desmopressin that increase plasma levels of factor VIII and von Willebrand factor.[76] A systematic review by Henry et al. compared TXA, EACA, and aprotinin with each other. They assessed the rate of intraoperative bleeding, need for transfusion, and their adverse effects and mortality rates. The study indicated that lysine derivatives such as TXA were safer than aprotinin but more effective than TXA in terms of improvement of blood use and hemorrhage.[77] TXA also inhibited fibrinolysis and needed to be used for prophylaxis in surgery with excessive bleeding and trauma since it could significantly reduce blood loss.[78]

   Reduction of Iatrogenic Blood Loss Top

Laboratory testing is the main reason for iatrogenic anemia after surgery. Nonpharmacologic policies can be thus applied to decrease frequent transfusion. Most of these policies benefit from little charge and can be simply employed when surgeons and nurses are encouraged to minimalize transfusion ordering. In a cohort study by Raad et al., it was indicated that hospital staff training about the removal of unnecessary laboratory tests except for arterial blood gas could be the cause of anemia reduction in ICU patients.[79] Eliminating the effect of diagnostic phlebotomy on the progress of anemia, particularly in pediatric patients is another policy;[80] for example, Myles et al. in a cohort study demonstrated that low-volume sampling tubes were related to a 42% saving of blood equal to 180 ml of blood over 21 days of admission.[81]

   Autologous Transfusion Top

Three main techniques are applied for autologous transfusion including preoperative autologous donation (PAD), acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH), and cell salvage.

PAD is one of the approaches that can lead to averting the needs for allogeneic RBC transfusion in some patients experiencing selective surgery. Patients can normally donate 1–3 units of packed RBCs over a course lasting 21–28 days before their surgery.[82] In this regard, a study demonstrated that the average cost associated with the blood donation up to transfusion of PAD was $338 per unit although; the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PAD have remained questionable.[83]

ANH is a technique in which blood is collected perioperatively and exchanged with colloid or crystalloid diluents.[84] Among the presently-used PBM policies, ANH is assumed as a rather safe strategy. ANH can remove postponement between bloodletting and surgery. It is also taken into account as a cost-effective method with no administration or store charges.[85],[86] Colloid fluids, as albumin, hydroxyl-ethyl starch, and gelatin are also known as current replacements. The merits of colloids include their leaking into the unsuitable area of interstitial space less than crystalloids and thus less volume is used. However, these fluids have particular contrary side effects such as vomiting, itchiness, coagulopathy, fever and chills, renal problems, and rare responses like bronchospasm.[87] Evidence in this respect described that the process of ANH contains the boost of cardiac efficiency.[88] In a systematic review and meta-analysis in this field, also it was reported that ANH could decrease the number of patients transfused, RBC transfusion, and bleeding in cardiac operations.[89]

JW and cases with infrequent blood groups or RBC immunoglobulins, for whom finding well-matched blood units are hard, can use cell salvage.[90],[91] There are some experimental studies supporting cell salvage usage in tumor surgery. In gynecologic malignancy, the removal of the uterus and tumor recurrence rates can delete tumor cells via a leuckoreducing filter.[91],[92],[93] This technique is assumed suitable for any patient whose blood loss is estimated by >1000 ml.[91] Sickle-cell anemia, hemostatic factors (e.g., thrombin and fibrin), and chemical contamination of collected blood coupled with alcohol and betadine are also introduced as contraindications to cell salvage. However, in a report, sickle-cell trait had been mentioned as one of the indications for cell salvage depending on clinical situations.[91],[94] It must be noted that the given method has become uncommon due to the development of surgical approaches and blood loss reduction.[95]

   Blood Ordering Guidelines Top

The Maximum surgical blood order schedule (MSBOS) is known as a list that helps to limit preoperative over-cross-matching of RBC units. MSBOS is a table of the frequently done selective surgical implements in a hospital with the most number of blood units which can be cross-matched for each operation.[96] In 1974, Friedman et al. conducted a study in Michigan and observed that the same number of cross-matched units had been consumed in similar surgeries. Subsequently, they established one MSBOS guideline to normalize blood product over-ordering according to patients' requirements. The outcomes of the MSBOS presentation were successful and caused a reduction in RBC units from 6.5% to 4.5% via the removal of over-ordering.[96] To create the MSBOS, the data also needed to be examined for each operation. Regarding each elective surgery, blood usage could be evaluated using various indices such as cross-match-to-transfusion (C:T) ratio.[97] This index was computed by the formulation:

The perfect rate for the C: T ratio is 1.0. The upper value also leads to more blood that is being cross-matched unreasonably. A truthful target for surgical measures is a C: T ratio between 2 and 3: 1, which is linked to blood use between 30% and 50%.[97] One of the conditions to implement this guideline is to routinize an antibody screening test or type and screen (T/S) in blood banks.[98] The order of T/S, which usually takes 1 h, also includes defining patient's ABO grouping, RhD type, and plasma screening for clinically important immunoglobulins.[99] Regarding certain patients and procedures (e.g., laparoscopy, cesarean section and lobectomy), T/S is a safe alternative for type and cross-match because it helps better consumption of blood products and is less expensive. T/S is also performed on the patient's plasma, not RBC units.[98] However, the MSBOS scheme does not include changes in transfusion needs among patients with similar surgeries, and many blood banks of hospitals still have high C: T ratios. Therefore, alternative mechanisms increasing the odds of transfusing cross-matched blood and thus, minimizing wastage of reserved blood units should be adopted. Accordingly, the surgical blood order equation (SBOE) was developed for the first time in a retrospective study about ordering RBC units for patient's requirements of total hip arthroplasty.[100] In 1998, Nuttall et al. compared SBOE with MSBOS and revealed that SBOE had a lower C:T ratio when compared to MSBOS (0.83 vs. 4.12). Charges were also lower due to SBOE implementation.[101]

   Summary Top

A PBM program is a conservative approach to improve the outcome of hospitalized patients. As with other therapeutic procedures, comprehensive clinical indications for PBM are constantly evolving and new indications are being identified. Therefore, more evidence and documentation are needed to optimize the methods used in PBM for surgical and nonsurgical patients. At the same time, effective regulations and regulatory measures and guidelines should be implemented by medical associations and national and international health authorities to promote and motivate the effective implementation of PBM programs.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

   References Top

Giangrande PL. The history of blood transfusion. Br J Haematol 2000;110:758-67.  Back to cited text no. 1
Biedrycki BA. Blood transfusions: Is “safest ever” safe enough? ONS News 2004;19:8-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
Rohde JM, Dimcheff DE, Blumberg N, Saint S, Langa KM, Kuhn L, et al. Health care-associated infection after red blood cell transfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2014;311:1317-26.  Back to cited text no. 3
Hare GM, Freedman J, David Mazer C. Review article: Risks of anemia and related management strategies: Can perioperative blood management improve patient safety? Can J Anaesth 2013;60:168-75.  Back to cited text no. 4
Shander A, Javidroozi M, Ozawa S, Hare GM. What is really dangerous: Anaemia or transfusion? Br J Anaesth 2011;107 Suppl 1:i41-59.  Back to cited text no. 5
Jayaraman S, Chalabi Z, Perel P, Guerriero C, Roberts I. The risk of transfusion-transmitted infections in sub-Saharan Africa. Transfusion 2010;50:433-42.  Back to cited text no. 6
Bolton-Maggs PH, Cohen H. Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) haemovigilance and progress is improving transfusion safety. Br J Haematol 2013;163:303-14.  Back to cited text no. 7
Vamvakas EC, Carven JH. RBC transfusion and postoperative length of stay in the hospital or the Intensive Care Unit among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: The effects of confounding factors. Transfusion 2000;40:832-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, Fink MP, Levy MM, Abraham E, et al. The CRIT Study: Anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill-current clinical practice in the United States. Crit Care Med 2004;32:39-52.  Back to cited text no. 9
Espinosa A, Arsenovic M, Hervig T, Sundic T, Aandahl A, Kronborg J, et al. Implementing a patient blood management program in Norway: Where to start? Transfus Apher Sci 2016;54:422-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
Shander A, Hofmann A, Ozawa S, Theusinger OM, Gombotz H, Spahn DR. Activity-based costs of blood transfusions in surgical patients at four hospitals. Transfusion 2010;50:753-65.  Back to cited text no. 11
Thomson A, Farmer S, Hofmann A, Isbister J, Shander A. Patient blood management – A new paradigm for transfusion medicine? ISBT Sci Ser 2009;4:423-35.  Back to cited text no. 12
Cobain TJ, Vamvakas EC, Wells A, Titlestad K. A survey of the demographics of blood use. Transfus Med 2007;17:1-15.  Back to cited text no. 13
Bennett-Guerrero E, Zhao Y, O'Brien SM, Ferguson TB Jr., Peterson ED, Gammie JS, et al. Variation in use of blood transfusion in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA 2010;304:1568-75.  Back to cited text no. 14
Friedman BA, Burns TL, Schork MA. A study of blood utilization by diagnosis, month of transfusion, and geographic region of the United States. Transfusion 1979;19:511-25.  Back to cited text no. 15
Javadzadeh Shahshahani H, Hatami H, Meraat N, Savabieh S. Epidemiology of blood component recipients in hospitals of Yazd, Iran. Transfus Med 2015;25:2-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
Rachmilewitz EA, Giardina PJ. How I treat thalassemia. Blood 2011;118:3479-88.  Back to cited text no. 17
Franchini M, Mannucci PM. Hemophilia A in the third millennium. Blood Rev 2013;27:179-84.  Back to cited text no. 18
Triulzi DJ, Assmann SF, Strauss RG, Ness PM, Hess JR, Kaufman RM, et al. The impact of platelet transfusion characteristics on posttransfusion platelet increments and clinical bleeding in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. Blood 2012;119:5553-62.  Back to cited text no. 19
Franchini M, Mannucci PM. Past, present and future of hemophilia: A narrative review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012;7:24.  Back to cited text no. 20
Astermark J, Santagostino E, Keith Hoots W. Clinical issues in inhibitors. Haemophilia 2010;16 Suppl 5:54-60.  Back to cited text no. 21
Cannas G, Fattoum J, Raba M, Dolange H, Barday G, François M, et al. Transfusion dependency at diagnosis and transfusion intensity during initial chemotherapy are associated with poorer outcomes in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol 2015;94:1797-806.  Back to cited text no. 22
DeZern AE, Williams K, Zahurak M, Hand W, Stephens RS, King KE, et al. Red blood cell transfusion triggers in acute leukemia: A randomized pilot study. Transfusion 2016;56:1750-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
Misra S. Human gene therapy: A brief overview of the genetic revolution. J Assoc Physicians India 2013;61:127-33.  Back to cited text no. 24
Dong A, Rivella S, Breda L. Gene therapy for hemoglobinopathies: Progress and challenges. Transl Res 2013;161:293-306.  Back to cited text no. 25
Jordan B. Effective gene therapy for hemophilia, at last…. Med Sci (Paris) 2018;34:267-74.  Back to cited text no. 26
Thompson AA, Walters MC, Kwiatkowski J, Rasko JE, Ribeil JA, Hongeng S, et al. Gene therapy in patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1479-93.  Back to cited text no. 27
Kwiatkowski JL, Thompson AA, Rasko J, Hongeng S, Schiller GJ, Anurathapan U, et al. Clinical outcomes up to 3 years following lentiglobin gene therapy for transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia in the northstar Hgb-204 study. Am Soc Hematol 2017;130 (Supplement 1):360.  Back to cited text no. 28
Mackenzie CF, Moon-Massat PF, Shander A, Javidroozi M, Greenburg AG. When blood is not an option: Factors affecting survival after the use of a hemoglobin-based oxygen carrier in 54 patients with life-threatening anemia. Anesth Analg 2010;110:685-93.  Back to cited text no. 29
Acosta JA, Yang JC, Winchell RJ, Simons RK, Fortlage DA, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, et al. Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:528-33.  Back to cited text no. 30
Gupta R, Fuks D, Bourdeaux C, Radkani P, Nomi T, Lamer C, et al. Impact of intraoperative blood loss on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 2017;31:4451-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
Rankin D, Zuleta-Alarcon A, Soghomonyan S, Abdel-Rasoul M, Castellon-Larios K, Bergese SD. Massive blood loss in elective spinal and orthopedic surgery: Retrospective review of intraoperative transfusion strategy. J Clin Anesth 2017;37:69-73.  Back to cited text no. 32
Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Lam CM, Yuen WK, et al. Improving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: Analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database. Ann Surg 2004;240:698-708.  Back to cited text no. 33
Kooby DA, Stockman J, Ben-Porat L, Gonen M, Jarnagin WR, Dematteo RP, et al. Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2003;237:860-9.  Back to cited text no. 34
Ascione R, Williams S, Lloyd CT, Sundaramoorthi T, Pitsis AA, Angelini GD. Reduced postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement after beating-heart coronary operations: A prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:689-96.  Back to cited text no. 35
Brouwers C, Hooftman B, Vonk S, Vonk A, Stooker W, Te Gussinklo WH, et al. Benchmarking the use of blood products in cardiac surgery to stimulate awareness of transfusion behaviour: Results from a four-year longitudinal study. Neth Heart J 2017;25:207-14.  Back to cited text no. 36
Kannan S, Meert KL, Mooney JF, Hillman-Wiseman C, Warrier I. Bleeding and coagulation changes during spinal fusion surgery: A comparison of neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis patients. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2002;3:364-9.  Back to cited text no. 37
Movig KL, Janssen MW, de Waal Malefijt J, Kabel PJ, Leufkens HG, Egberts AC. Relationship of serotonergic antidepressants and need for blood transfusion in orthopedic surgical patients. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2354-8.  Back to cited text no. 38
Arababadi MK, Hassanshahi G, Pourfathollah AA, Zarandi ER, Kennedy D. Post-transfusion occult hepatitis B (OBI): A global challenge for blood recipients and health authorities. Hepat Mon 2011;11:714-8.  Back to cited text no. 39
Silvergleid AJ. Transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease. Vol. 5. : UptoDate; 2022  Back to cited text no. 40
Fisahn C, Schmidt C, Schroeder JE, Vialle E, Lieberman IH, Dettori JR, et al. Blood transfusion and postoperative infection in spine surgery: A systematic review. Global Spine J 2018;8:198-207.  Back to cited text no. 41
Gregersen M, Damsgaard EM, Borris LC. Blood transfusion and risk of infection in frail elderly after hip fracture surgery: The TRIFE randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015;25:1031-8.  Back to cited text no. 42
Clifford L, Jia Q, Subramanian A, Yadav H, Wilson GA, Murphy SP, et al. Characterizing the epidemiology of postoperative transfusion-related acute lung injury. Anesthesiology 2015;122:12-20.  Back to cited text no. 43
Harada N, Shirabe K, Maeda T, Kayashima H, Ishida T, Maehara Y. Blood transfusion is associated with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy in Child-Pugh class A patients. World J Surg 2015;39:1044-51.  Back to cited text no. 44
Schwann TA, Habib JR, Khalifeh JM, Nauffal V, Bonnell M, Clancy C, et al. Effects of blood transfusion on cause-specific late mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting-less is more. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:465-73.  Back to cited text no. 45
Weber EW, Slappendel R, Prins MH, van der Schaaf DB, Durieux ME, Strümper D. Perioperative blood transfusions and delayed wound healing after hip replacement surgery: Effects on duration of hospitalization. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1416-21.  Back to cited text no. 46
Newman ET, Watters TS, Lewis JS, Jennings JM, Wellman SS, Attarian DE, et al. Impact of perioperative allogeneic and autologous blood transfusion on acute wound infection following total knee and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:279-84.  Back to cited text no. 47
Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA. Transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM): An update. Blood Rev 2007;21:327-48.  Back to cited text no. 48
Shander A, Hofmann A, Gombotz H, Theusinger OM, Spahn DR. Estimating the cost of blood: Past, present, and future directions. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007;21:271-89.  Back to cited text no. 49
Forbes JM, Anderson MD, Anderson GF, Bleecker GC, Rossi EC, Moss GS. Blood transfusion costs: A multicenter study. Transfusion 1991;31:318-23.  Back to cited text no. 50
Crémieux PY, Barrett B, Anderson K, Slavin MB. Cost of outpatient blood transfusion in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2755-61.  Back to cited text no. 51
Jackson BR, Busch MP, Stramer SL, AuBuchon JP. The cost-effectiveness of NAT for HIV, HCV, and HBV in whole-blood donations. Transfusion 2003;43:721-9.  Back to cited text no. 52
Hofmann A, Farmer S, Shander A. Five drivers shifting the paradigm from product-focused transfusion practice to patient blood management. Oncologist 2011;16 Suppl 3:3-11.  Back to cited text no. 53
Ozawa S. Patient blood management: Use of topical hemostatic and sealant agents. AORN J 2013;98:461-78.  Back to cited text no. 54
Butcher A, Richards T. Cornerstones of patient blood management in surgery. Transfus Med 2018;28:150-7.  Back to cited text no. 55
Gallagher T, Leahy MF, Darby S, Campbell L, Howman R, Watts S, et al. Assembling a state-wide patient blood management program as a standard of care: The Western Australian experience. ISBT Sci Ser 2017;12:365-74.  Back to cited text no. 56
Hajjar LA, Fukushima JT, Almeida JP, Osawa EA, Galas FR. Strategies to reduce blood transfusion: A Latin-American perspective. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015;28:81-8.  Back to cited text no. 57
Armas-Loughran B, Kalra R, Carson JL. Evaluation and management of anemia and bleeding disorders in surgical patients. Med Clin North Am 2003;87:229-42.  Back to cited text no. 58
Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, Rizvi SI, Culliford L, Angelini GD. Increased mortality, postoperative morbidity, and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation 2007;116:2544-52.  Back to cited text no. 59
Lasocki S, Krauspe R, von Heymann C, Mezzacasa A, Chainey S, Spahn DR. PREPARE: The prevalence of perioperative anaemia and need for patient blood management in elective orthopaedic surgery: A multicentre, observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015;32:160-7.  Back to cited text no. 60
Cuenca J, García-Erce JA, Martínez F, Cardona R, Pérez-Serrano L, Muñoz M. Preoperative haematinics and transfusion protocol reduce the need for transfusion after total knee replacement. Int J Surg 2007;5:89-94.  Back to cited text no. 61
Lidder PG, Sanders G, Whitehead E, Douie WJ, Mellor N, Lewis SJ, et al. Pre-operative oral iron supplementation reduces blood transfusion in colorectal surgery – A prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:418-21.  Back to cited text no. 62
Muñoz M, Gómez-Ramírez S, Campos A. Iron supplementation for perioperative anaemia in patient blood management. EMJ Hematol 2014;1:123-32.  Back to cited text no. 63
Adkinson NF, Strauss WE, Macdougall IC, Bernard KE, Auerbach M, Kaper RF, et al. Comparative safety of intravenous ferumoxytol versus ferric carboxymaltose in iron deficiency anemia: A randomized trial. Am J Hematol 2018;93:683-90.  Back to cited text no. 64
Unger EF, Thompson AM, Blank MJ, Temple R. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents-time for a reevaluation. N Engl J Med 2010;362:189-92.  Back to cited text no. 65
Hashimoto K, Harada M, Kamijo Y. Pure red cell aplasia induced by anti-erythropoietin antibodies, well-controlled with tacrolimus. Int J Hematol 2016;104:502-5.  Back to cited text no. 66
McKoy JM, Stonecash RE, Cournoyer D, Rossert J, Nissenson AR, Raisch DW, et al. Epoetin-associated pure red cell aplasia: Past, present, and future considerations. Transfusion 2008;48:1754-62.  Back to cited text no. 67
Bohlius J, Schmidlin K, Brillant C, Schwarzer G, Trelle S, Seidenfeld J, et al. Recombinant human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and mortality in patients with cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2009;373:1532-42.  Back to cited text no. 68
Goodnough LT. The use of erythropoietin to increase red cell mass. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:S10-8.  Back to cited text no. 69
Guerreiro JP, Badaro BS, Balbino JR, Danieli MV, Queiroz AO, Cataneo DC. Application of tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty – Prospective randomized trial. Open Orthop J 2017;11:1049-57.  Back to cited text no. 70
Hans GA, Besser MW. The place of viscoelastic testing in clinical practice. Br J Haematol 2016;173:37-48.  Back to cited text no. 71
Khalaf Adeli E, Mostafa Alavi S, Alizadeh-Ghavidel A, Bakhshandeh-Abkenar H, Pourfathollah AA. Perioperative changes in platelet count and function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2017;31:37.  Back to cited text no. 72
Smith I, Pearse BL, Faulke DJ, Naidoo R, Nicotra L, Hopkins P, et al. Targeted bleeding management reduces the requirements for blood component therapy in lung transplant recipients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017;31:426-33.  Back to cited text no. 73
Serraino GF, Murphy GJ. Routine use of viscoelastic blood tests for diagnosis and treatment of coagulopathic bleeding in cardiac surgery: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2017;118:823-33.  Back to cited text no. 74
Forestier F, Coiffic A, Mouton C, Ekouevi D, Chêne G, Janvier G. Platelet function point-of-care tests in post-bypass cardiac surgery: Are they relevant? Br J Anaesth 2002;89:715-21.  Back to cited text no. 75
Mannucci PM. Hemostatic drugs. N Engl J Med 1998;339:245-53.  Back to cited text no. 76
Henry DA, Moxey AJ, Carless PA, O'Connell D, McClelland B, Henderson KM, et al. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. The Cochrane Library; Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(1).  Back to cited text no. 77
Williams-Johnson JA, McDonald AH, Strachan GG, Williams EW. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2) A randomised, placebo-controlled trial. West Indian Med J 2010;59:612-24.  Back to cited text no. 78
Raad S, Elliott R, Dickerson E, Khan B, Diab K. Reduction of laboratory utilization in the Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med 2017;32:500-7.  Back to cited text no. 79
Shander A, Javidroozi M, Lobel G. Patient blood management in the Intensive Care Unit. Transfus Med Rev 2017;31:264-71.  Back to cited text no. 80
Myles N, von Wielligh J, Kyriacou M, Ventrice T, To LB. A cohort study assessing the impact of small volume blood tubes on diagnostic test quality and iatrogenic blood loss in a cohort of adult haematology patients. Intern Med J 2018;48:817-21.  Back to cited text no. 81
Boucher BA, Hannon TJ. Blood management: A primer for clinicians. Pharmacotherapy 2007;27:1394-411.  Back to cited text no. 82
Tretiak R, Laupacis A, Rivière M, McKerracher K, Souêtre E. Cost of allogeneic and autologous blood transfusion in Canada. Canadian Cost of Transfusion Study Group. CMAJ 1996;154:1501-8.  Back to cited text no. 83
Scharman CD, Burger D, Shatzel JJ, Kim E, DeLoughery TG. Treatment of individuals who cannot receive blood products for religious or other reasons. Am J Hematol 2017;92:1370-81.  Back to cited text no. 84
Yang L, Wang HH, Wei FS, Ma LX. Evaluation of acute normovolemic hemodilution in patients undergoing intracranial meningioma resection: A quasi-experimental trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8093.  Back to cited text no. 85
Spahn DR, Casutt M. Eliminating blood transfusions: New aspects and perspectives. Anesthesiology 2000;93:242-55.  Back to cited text no. 86
Mandal M, Chattopadhyay S, Bagchi T, Chakrabarti S. Comparison of crystalloid and colloid preload on maternal hemodynamics in elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Int J Res Med Sci 2017;4:2428-35.  Back to cited text no. 87
Korosue K, Heros RC, Ogilvy CS, Hyodo A, Tu YK, Graichen R. Comparison of crystalloids and colloids for hemodilution in a model of focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosurg 1990;73:576-84.  Back to cited text no. 88
Barile L, Fominskiy E, Di Tomasso N, Alpìzar Castro LE, Landoni G, De Luca M, et al. Acute normovolemic hemodilution reduces allogeneic red blood cell transfusion in cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesth Analg 2017;124:743-52.  Back to cited text no. 89
Marco R, Tommaso BF, Gianluca Z, Vanni A, Antonio C, Salvatore B, et al. Perioperative management of patients refusing blood products. Int J Anesthetic Anesthesiol 2016;3:053.  Back to cited text no. 90
Sikorski RA, Rizkalla NA, Yang WW, Frank SM. Autologous blood salvage in the era of patient blood management. Vox Sang 2017;112:499-510.  Back to cited text no. 91
Connor JP, Morris PC, Alagoz T, Anderson B, Bottles K, Buller RE. Intraoperative autologous blood collection and autotransfusion in the surgical management of early cancers of the uterine cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:373-8.  Back to cited text no. 92
Catling S, Williams S, Freites O, Rees M, Davies C, Hopkins L. Use of a leucocyte filter to remove tumour cells from intra-operative cell salvage blood. Anaesthesia 2008;63:1332-8.  Back to cited text no. 93
Okunuga A, Skelton VA. Use of cell salvage in patients with sickle cell trait. Int J Obstet Anesth 2009;18:90-1.  Back to cited text no. 94
Frank SM, Rothschild JA, Masear CG, Rivers RJ, Merritt WT, Savage WJ, et al. Optimizing preoperative blood ordering with data acquired from an anesthesia information management system. Anesthesiology 2013;118:1286-97.  Back to cited text no. 95
Friedman BA. An analysis of surgical blood use in United States hospitals with application to the maximum surgical blood order schedule. Transfusion 1979;19:268-78.  Back to cited text no. 96
Voak CD, Napier JA, Boulton FE, Cann R, Finney RD, Fraser ID, Guidelines for implementation of a maximum surgical blood order schedule. Int J Lab Hematol 1990;12:321-7.  Back to cited text no. 97
White MJ, Hazard SW 3rd, Frank SM, Boyd JS, Wick EC, Ness PM, et al. The evolution of perioperative transfusion testing and blood ordering. Anesth Analg 2015;120:1196-203.  Back to cited text no. 98
Boral LI, Henry JB. The type and screen: A safe alternative and supplement in selected surgical procedures. Transfusion 1977;17:163-8.  Back to cited text no. 99
Nuttall GA, Santrach PJ, Oliver WC Jr., Horlocker TT, Shaughnessy WJ, Cabanela ME, et al. The predictors of red cell transfusions in total hip arthroplasties. Transfusion 1996;36:144-9.  Back to cited text no. 100
Nuttall GA, Santrach PJ, Oliver WC Jr., Ereth MH, Horlocker TT, Cabanela ME, et al. A prospective randomized trial of the surgical blood order equation for ordering red cells for total hip arthroplasty patients. Transfusion 1998;38:828-33.  Back to cited text no. 101

Correspondence Address:
Karim Shamsasenjan
Department of Immunology, Division of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_14_21

Rights and Permissions



    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

    Blood Transfusio...
    Blood Transfusio...
    Blood Transfusio...
   Risks of Transfusion
   Costs of Transfusion
    What is Patient ...
   Anemia Correction
    Point-of-Care Te...
    Reduction of Iat...
    Autologous Trans...
    Blood Ordering G...

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded51    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

Association Contact us | Sitemap | Advertise | What's New | Copyright and Disclaimer | Privacy Notice

2006 - Asian Journal of Transfusion Science | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 10th November, 2006